6 |
The Hepworth Competitive Congressional Plan |
A congressional plan with the goal of creating two highly competitive districts in Utah while being minimally disruptive to communities of interest. The plan consists of a district containing highly educated conservative areas from Logan to Provo; a highly competitive district running form Ogden, all of Davis County, to Salt Lake City to Park City; a highly competitive district including most of Salt Lake County's suburban areas, and a district containing the high growth area in the south end of Salt Lake County and north end of Utah county as well as the rest of the state. |
2021-09-27 |
Admin User |
Stuart Hepworth |
3 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
11 |
CWeaver congressional map |
I have drawn these maps so that the urban/suburban communities of the Wasatch Front can get proper representation in districts 1-3. By concentrating rural communities in district 4, they can be sure to have a strong voice in their electoral contests. |
2021-09-27 |
Admin User |
Christian Weaver |
2 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
13 |
Compact Common-Sense Redistricting Plan |
Simple districts, population balanced, high affinity and proximity to similar communities. Rural regions combined, county boarders taken into consideration. |
2021-09-27 |
Admin User |
Brent Melling |
1 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
14 |
Congressional_IanBLarm |
There is absolutely no deviation in the population for this plan. This plan is as close to singular boxes and along as many county lines as possible. This is the most fair map by population possible. |
2021-09-27 |
Admin User |
Ian Larm |
1 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
15 |
Congressional_IanBLarm_2 |
A zero population deviation congressional map. Splits Utah fairly. |
2021-09-27 |
Admin User |
Ian Larm |
0 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
16 |
Congressional - Compact - Rural District |
Map with district focused on rural Utah. Other 3 districts are compact along I-15 Wasatch Front. Weber and Salt Lake the only county splits. Magna and Riverton the only city splits. Deviations 6 or fewer people. Limited precinct splits |
2021-09-27 |
Admin User |
Macklin Scheldrup |
1 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
17 |
ChancesHumanCongressfromShapefile |
Proposed Congressional districts for Utah |
2021-09-27 |
Admin User |
Mike Bender |
0 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
18 |
Congressional - North to South |
Defines districts from north to south. No county is divided more than once. No district is entirely within one or two counties. (No \"cracking\". No \"packing\".) |
2021-09-27 |
Admin User |
Niel Mejia |
0 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
20 |
The Hepworth Compact Congressional Plan |
A congressional plan for Utah aimed at keeping communities of interest together to the greatest degree possible. The plan consists of a district containing all of Northern Utah; a district containing Summit county and a majority of Salt Lake County, including all of Salt Lake City and its immediate suburbs; a district containing the high growth area of south Salt Lake County and northern Utah County; and a district containing the Provo area and the rest of the state. |
2021-09-27 |
Admin User |
Stuart Hepworth |
1 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
21 |
The Hepworth Competitive Congressional Plan |
A congressional plan with the goal of creating two highly competitive districts in Utah while being minimally disruptive to communities of interest. The plan consists of a district containing highly educated conservative areas from Logan to Provo; a highly competitive district running form Ogden, all of Davis County, to Salt Lake City to Park City; a highly competitive district including most of Salt Lake County's suburban areas, and a district containing the high growth area in the south end of Salt Lake County and north end of Utah county as well as the rest of the state. |
2021-09-27 |
Admin User |
Stuart Hepworth |
1 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
22 |
The Hepworth Mixed Compact Congressional Plan |
A congressional plan for Utah that keeps communities of interest together while fulfilling the Legislature's desire for each district to contain a substantial amount of rural areas.\n\nThe plan consists of a district containing all of Northern Utah; a plan containing Salt Lake City, most of West Valley City, all of the east-side Salt Lake City suburbs except for Draper, as well as all of Summit, Wasatch, Duchesne, Uintah, and Daggett counties; a district containing all of the West side Salt Lake City suburbs sans Bluffdale and part of Herriman as well as all of Western Utah; and a district containing all of Utah County along with Southeastern Utah. |
2021-09-27 |
Admin User |
Stuart Hepworth |
1 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
23 |
The Hepworth Mixed Competitive Congressional Plan |
A congressional plan for Utah featuring two highly competitive districts. I don't like this plan as much as my normal competitive plan, but it complies with the goals of legislative redistricting leaders for each district to feature a mix of urban and rural areas. \n\nIt consists of a district including most of northern Utah sans Morgan, Ogden, and some Ogden suburbs, along with Tooele and parts of Juab and Millard; a district including Ogden, Morgan, Salt Lake City, the rest of Salt Lake County west of Redwood Road, Summit County sans the Park City Area, Duchesne, and Uintah; a district containing San Juan, Grand, Green River, Carbon, nearly all of Wasatch, Mapleton, Springville, Provo, Orem, Vineyard, the Park City Area, and Salt Lake County east of Redwood Road sans the southern part; and a district containing the rest of Utah, including the south part of Salt Lake County, most of Utah County, and most of southern Utah including Cedar City and St. George. |
2021-09-27 |
Admin User |
Stuart Hepworth |
2 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
24 |
The Hepworth Rural Maximizing Congressional Plan |
A highly competitive congressional plan for Utah aimed at providing rural areas with better representation by creating a district in which they constitute a majority that also keeps Utah county whole while creating highly competitive districts centered in Salt Lake and Davis county. |
2021-09-27 |
Admin User |
Stuart Hepworth |
0 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
35 |
Michael - Congressional Map |
Congressional Districts Map |
2021-09-27 |
Admin User |
Michael Anderson |
0 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
36 |
Congressional - Jeff Ricks - 9-3-21 |
Two more urban districts with two more rural districts. |
2021-09-27 |
Admin User |
Jeff Ricks |
0 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
39 |
Utah Congressional Districts |
The idea was to make district boundaries along logical areas of the Wasatch front urban areas while clustering the rural areas into sections that may be beneficial. |
2021-09-27 |
Admin User |
Bryan Hull |
0 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
41 |
A Friendly Congressional Suggestion |
A logical, compact district plan that splits only three cities.
1. NORTH WASATCH FRONT: Pleasant View to SLC.
2. CENTRAL SALT LAKE VALLEY: Magna to Sandy.
3. SOUTHERN WASATCH FRONT: Herriman to Santaquin.
4. RURAL UTAH. |
2021-09-27 |
Admin User |
Daniel Friend |
2 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
42 |
Utah Congressional - Submission by Evan Willie |
Utah Congressional Map Starting with a blank map.
The intention of this map was to try to minimize splitting Counties and Cities as much as possible.
This plan achieves this, while maintaining a population deviation of 0.001%, or +/- 4 people between districts. |
2021-09-27 |
Admin User |
Evan Willie |
4 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
44 |
Nhall Congressional 4_revised v2 |
This might be a repeat submission due to software glitches. 1st submission showed disconnected geography and when attempting to fix it, the district population distribution was messed up, but it allowed submission even with issues. 2nd submission show as successful, but then received an error message that email server was down and messages wasn't received. Not sure if plan was submitted so sending in again. Here are notes from previous submission.
25%-30% of Utah voters vote Democrat. Yet, it's rare that these voter's views/values are represented by our politicians. In some circles, the claim is that the only way to achieve district population balance is by mixing rural with Urban/Suburban. Yes, if the goal is to disenfranchise voters, that is the only way. Why else would the most Democratic parts of the state be represented by the most far-right congressmen?
This map is not perfect, but it's a big improvement over the current district configuration where even moderate conservative voters are not well represented. The goal with redistricting should be to have the majority of voters represented by politicians whose values are in alignment.
With this proposed map, this is what the voters will get:
District 1: Mix of suburban and rural (with some urban in the Ogden core). This will result in a moderate Republican being voted in (with the rare possibility of a moderate Democrat). This is what the majority of these constituents want.
District 2: Mainly Urban & suburban. This district will consistently vote for a Democrat - sometimes a progressive, but more than likely a moderate. This is what the majority of these constituents want.
District 3: Mainly suburban. This district will vote for a moderate Republican with small chance of an occasional moderate Democrat. This is what the majority of these constituents want.
District 4: Mainly rural with some exurbs and the population clusters of Cedar City and St. George. These voters will usually go for a more conservative Republican, but may also vote for more moderates as well. There might be pockets of constituents who won't like this, but again, this is what the majority of these constituents want.
Can we please have a more balanced congressional map this time around? Please do the right and fair thing.
Thank You. |
2021-09-27 |
Admin User |
Nathan Hall |
0 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
46 |
Utah Submission |
This plan prioritizes the minimization of county splits, compactness, and ensuring that communities of interest are fairly paired together.
District 1 - North Utah, no county splits
District 2 - South Utah, splits Utah County with District 3
District 3 - Utah and southern Salt Lake County, including Orem, Provo, Lehi, West/South Jordan etc.
District 4 - Contained entirely within Salt Lake County. Includes Salt Lake City proper, West Valley City, Taylorsville, Sandy etc.
No district deviates more that 0.07% from the ideal population. I hope you will take this proposal into consideration while helping lead the great state of Utah into the next years of government. |
2021-09-27 |
Admin User |
Benjamin Greene |
3 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
47 |
UT REDISTRICT PLAN |
Proposed Congressional District Map |
2021-09-27 |
Admin User |
Edward Trageser |
3 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
48 |
map 1 |
No need to reinvent the wheel. This map generally follows existing borders (i.e. roads, rivers, counties etc.) while mostly keeping communities of interest together. In this plan, the 3rd and 1st districts took on more of Salt Lake County while the 4th and 2nd lost some of Salt Lake County. The 4th also took on the Vineyard area using Geneva Road and the Front Runner tracks as the border. |
2021-09-27 |
Admin User |
Jared Dallin |
1 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
49 |
TMC |
Focused on keeping similar populations in a district |
2021-09-27 |
Admin User |
Travis Clemens |
1 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
50 |
Nhall revised buggy map software |
Bug with map software allowed faulty district distribution map to be submitted. This is revised with correct populations.
25%-30% of Utah voters vote Democrat. Yet, it's rare that these voter's views/values are represented by our politicians. In some circles, the claim is that the only way to achieve district population balance is by mixing rural with Urban/Suburban. Yes, if the goal is to disenfranchise voters, that is the only way. Why else would the most Democratic parts of the state be represented by the most far-right congressmen?
This map is not perfect, but it's a big improvement over the current district configuration where even moderate conservative voters are not well represented. The goal with redistricting should be to have the majority of voters represented by politicians whose values are in alignment.
With this proposed map, this is what the voters will get:
District 1: Mix of suburban and rural (with some urban in the Ogden core). This will result in a moderate Republican being voted in (with the rare possibility of a moderate Democrat). This is what the majority of these constituents want.
District 2: Mainly Urban & suburban. This district will consistently vote for a Democrat - sometimes a progressive, but more than likely a moderate. This is what the majority of these constituents want.
District 3: Mainly suburban. This district will vote for a moderate Republican with small chance of an occasional moderate Democrat. This is what the majority of these constituents want.
District 4: Mainly rural with some exurbs and the population clusters of Cedar City and St. George. These voters will usually go for a more conservative Republican, but may also vote for more moderates as well. There might be pockets of constituents who won't like this, but again, this is what the majority of these constituents want.
Can we please have a more balanced congressional map this time around? Please do the right and fair thing.
Thank You. |
2021-09-27 |
Admin User |
Nathan Hall |
5 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
51 |
Congressional - North to South |
Defines districts from north to south. No county is divided more than once. No district is entirely within one or two counties. (No 'cracking'. No 'packing'.) |
2021-09-28 |
Admin User |
Niel Mejia |
0 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
52 |
Adjust Current Districts (2021-09-13) |
Shifting lines on current districts |
2021-09-29 |
Admin User |
Jason Tomlinson |
2 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
54 |
Lorraine Jackson's Plan |
I created a map based on what seemed like it could be represented by a single individual. To try and represent Goshen and downtown SLC with the same human just doesn't make any sense. In my map, each district has a distinct identity, and voters will be fairly represented. |
2021-10-01 |
Admin User |
Lorraine Jackson |
4 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
56 |
The Hepworth Compact Congressional Plan v1.1 |
A congressional plan for Utah with the aim of being compact and aligning to communities of interest while minimizing county splits. v1.1 Now has zero population deviation. |
2021-10-08 |
Admin User |
Stuart Hepworth |
0 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
57 |
The Hepworth Competitive Congressional Plan v1.1 |
A congressional plan for Utah with the goal of creating two highly competitive districts.
v1.1 Swapped Draper and Riverton between districts 3 and 4, eliminating a city split. Also reduced population deviation to zero. |
2021-10-08 |
Admin User |
Stuart Hepworth |
2 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
60 |
Conression Districts |
4 districts |
2021-10-08 |
Admin User |
Cameron Carter |
1 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
61 |
Congressional Districts Rural and Population Centers |
The goal of my plan was to group the population into plans based on their unique characteristics. I grouped the rural areas together as much as possible and created three districts from the Wasatch front population center splitting them up in a north to south manner. |
2021-10-08 |
Admin User |
Kathryn Bekker |
0 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
62 |
1 Large Rural |
Have a single large district for most of rural Utah, with the Wasatch front area divided up into 3 districts. |
2021-10-08 |
Admin User |
Jake Smith |
1 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
63 |
Congressional redistrict |
Congressional redistrict keeping districts less spread out where possible |
2021-10-08 |
Admin User |
Teri Josephson |
0 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
64 |
CAN_8 |
Great map with each rep having a good share of urban and rural. |
2021-10-11 |
Admin User |
Luke |
2 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
65 |
Utah redistricting map |
2021-2031 Congressional districts proposal |
2021-10-11 |
Admin User |
David Melonas |
1 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
66 |
Draft #1 |
An attempt at creating balanced congressional districts by an interested citizen |
2021-10-11 |
Admin User |
Nick Johnson |
0 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
68 |
Congressional Districts |
Following county lines as much as possible, avoiding the splitting of cities and communities. |
2021-10-12 |
Admin User |
Glen K Thurston |
2 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
70 |
Utah_2020 |
This map starts with the current districts. It keeps natural neighborhoods together in Salt Lake County by using major corridors as boundaries. It also gives a greater representation to the population base of the state with all four reps sharing responsibility. |
2021-10-14 |
Admin User |
Luke Tanner |
1 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
71 |
Congressional Districts - Chuck Goode |
Communities share a common need - D1 military D2 water/tourism D3 tourism D4 air quality/tourism |
2021-10-14 |
Admin User |
Chuck Goode |
2 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
72 |
RichMingo |
This plan is based on the premise that democracy works much better when voters select their elected officials based on the issues they are most concerned with rather the elected officials selecting their voters based on the issues they are most concerned with, i.e. getting re-elected.
District 1 – We used to be rural but that cow left the barn years ago! Includes the I-15 corridor from North Salt Lake north to Smithfield and along Highway 40 including Heber Valley.
District 2 – This is as rural as Utah gets and also includes Washington and Iron Counties.
District 3 – This is the Silicone Slopes District which includes the I-15 corridor from south Salt Lake County south along the east shore of Utah Lake, Provo, Orem and south to Payson.
District 4 – The Urban Core District which includes most of Salt Lake County and adjacent watershed areas. |
2021-10-14 |
Admin User |
Richard Mingo |
0 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
73 |
Utah2020 |
This map takes into consideration the current boundaries. It also gives the city with the largest population multiple representatives. Almost all of the boundaries in Salt Lake City are along natural boundaries. I used State Street, I-15, 3900 South, Constitution, etc. This doesn't split neighborhoods and gives everyone an equal share. Each member has urban and rural which is also imperative for a state like Utah that's so heavily owned by the federal government. |
2021-10-15 |
Admin User |
Luke Tanner |
3 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
80 |
Rural Donut |
One "rural" district including everything but the Wasatch Front, and 3 Wasatch Front urban districts. I tried to divide cities as little as possible (only split Plain city, Draper, and South Salt Lake). |
2021-10-19 |
Admin User |
Brandon Plewe |
1 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
81 |
North-South |
Creates compact, unified Northern Utah and Southern Utah districts, with two urban districts in the middle. Tries to divide counties and cities as little as possible; only Bountiful and a small part of Provo are divided. |
2021-10-19 |
Admin User |
Brandon Plewe |
1 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
82 |
Erik's Perfect Plan |
Erik's Perfect Plan |
2021-10-19 |
Admin User |
Erik Bieging |
1 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
83 |
Wasatch Front & Back Cong Districts - NO CITY SPLITS |
A congressional map focused on the COIs on both the Wasatch Front and Back. District 1 represents rural Utah as a COI. While CDs 2-4 make a circle of districts connecting the population centers along the Wasatch Front and Back. District 3 is entirely within Salt Lake County. Absolutely NO Cities are split between districts. Weber, Salt Lake, and Summit are the only county splits. Overall a compact map with a district for the North Wasatch, the Central Wasatch, and South Wasatch regions. |
2021-10-19 |
Admin User |
Macklin Scheldrup |
3 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
84 |
Layered Cake |
This plan keeps all but 3 city boundaries (North Salt Lake, West Jordan, and American Fork) fully intact while also keeping each district competitive by including both rural and urban areas. |
2021-10-19 |
Admin User |
Landon Hooley |
1 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
85 |
Utah Compact and Proportional - JM |
This map represents a fair district plan for Utahans. This plan gives rural Utah the most representation possible, while keeping urban and suburban areas compact. |
2021-10-19 |
Admin User |
Jordan Mann |
5 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
86 |
Layer Cake Is perfect |
These congressional districts make sense. Although I did not draw this map, I have tried my hand. The problem I kept running into were the roads, how could a congressperson cover their district if they had no connecting roads to get there. Bravo for the Layer-Cake! |
2021-10-19 |
Admin User |
Susan Atkin |
3 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
87 |
Jackson District Plan - Congress |
A possible redistribution plan for the 4 Congressional districts for the state of Utah, prioritizing cohesion within the core of Utah's population. |
2021-10-19 |
Admin User |
Jackson Skinner |
3 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
88 |
Congress_Rebalance Current Districts |
This plan rebalances the current districts for population and tries to use more prominent features like freeways to separate districts. |
2021-10-19 |
Admin User |
Bob Volkov |
0 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
92 |
Utah congressional map updated |
I have also striven to draw district lines to keep communities and neighborhoods together, insofar as the mapping software allows. While the rules allow for some slight population, the map making tool does not. This is an updated version of my Congressional map. In this version, I have incorporated the smaller communities of northern Utah along I-15 into District 1 and adjusted the other district lines accordingly. District 2's north line was pushed up a bit, as was District 3's. Some of the communities of Saratoga Springs and Eagle Mountain got split a bit in order to have a zero population deviation, as the application requires. In addition, make some improvements by incorporating some households with their neighbors in the Provo area by including them in District 3. |
2021-10-19 |
Admin User |
Christian Weaver |
3 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
94 |
Compact & Contiguous M Reid 2021-10-19 |
Highest priority given to respecting county and city boundaries, subject to target deviation constraints.
Besides Salt Lake County, Carbon is the only county that is split between two CDs.
Kearns is the only city/township in the state split between two CDs.
All four districts have regular compact shapes. |
2021-10-20 |
Admin User |
Malcolm Reid |
3 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
97 |
Utah_2022 |
Map is the most balanced, fair yet. |
2021-10-21 |
Admin User |
Luke Tanner |
10 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
98 |
Imy's Pl;an |
Districts have like interests rural, formerly rural, urban central core, urban-techno |
2021-10-22 |
Admin User |
Imy Mingo |
3 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
99 |
Michael's Zero Deviation Congressional Map |
Zero deviation between districts - all districts with exactly equal population. |
2021-10-22 |
Admin User |
Michael A |
1 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
100 |
UUP Redistrict Plan 1 |
United Utah Party. This is the UUP's proposed redistricting plan. |
2021-10-25 |
Admin User |
Kellen Everett |
6 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
101 |
2021 Utah Congressional - EWillie - v 3.0 |
This is an update to the previous Utah Congressional map by Evan Willie.
Upon reviewing my original submission, there were a few areas of city splits that were unintentional such as Provo and East Basin.
This version puts all of Summit County into D2. To compensate, all of Vineyard is moved to D3. Also, the boundaries between D3 and D4 in Orem are adjusted, as well as the boundaries between D2 and D4 in Midvale are adjusted.
This map has a max population of +3 (D2) and a min population of -4 (D1). |
2021-10-25 |
Admin User |
Evan Willie |
7 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
102 |
David Reece Congressional Plan |
This plan splits the rural areas of Utah so that the connected counties are connected along larger transportation routes. It then adds the four largest counties to those rural areas as full counties. The plan converges in Salt Lake County, which is split into three remaining districts. Those splits are entirely along city boundaries. |
2021-10-26 |
Admin User |
David Reece |
14 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
103 |
WardCongMap.01 |
This is a congressional map that prioritizes keeping current boundaries largely intact. The map was arrived at by adding Midway and Heber to CD1 so that it has enough population and then slightly adjusting the boundaries in Davis County and East Salt Lake to bring the population amounts into balance.
The map's advantage is that anyone can see from the shapes of the districts that the changes have been minimal - lessening any perception of gerrymandering. |
2021-10-26 |
Admin User |
Raymond Ward |
13 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
108 |
Benjamin Thompson Plan 1 |
Kept mostly to county lines except for Salt Lake County borders. All districts have <2% variance and allow for further population development. |
2021-10-28 |
Admin User |
Benjamin Thompson |
3 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
110 |
Dillan Burnett Redistricting Option |
Potential Redistricting option for the public/redistricting committee to review. |
2021-10-28 |
Admin User |
Dillan Burnett |
4 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
115 |
UIRC Final Recommendation -- Public |
Congressional plan submitted to the Legislative Redistricting Committee by the Utah Independent Redistricting Commission. |
2021-11-01 |
Admin User |
UIRC |
11 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
116 |
UIRC Final Recommendation -- Orange |
Congressional plan submitted to the Legislative Redistricting Committee by the Utah Independent Redistricting Commission. |
2021-11-01 |
Admin User |
UIRC |
28 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
117 |
UIRC Final Recommendation -- Purple |
Congressional plan submitted to the Legislative Redistricting Committee by the Utah Independent Redistricting Commission. |
2021-11-01 |
Admin User |
UIRC |
49 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
128 |
Compact by County |
Computed for most compactness by MGGG taking in Utah Constitutional factors for representation. |
2021-11-01 |
Admin User |
Dimitri Moumoulidis |
8 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
132 |
Committee Chairs Proposal - Congressional |
Congressional plan proposed for consideration by the Legislative Redistricting Committee. |
2021-11-05 |
Admin User |
Sen. Scott Sandall and Rep. Paul Ray |
942 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
133 |
David Reece Congressional Plan with 3 Urban-Rural Districts |
Northern Utah district that has complete counties, Salt Lake County split into two districts: a northern one combined with the Uintah Basin, the southern one combine with northern Utah County. The last district contains all of southern Utah and southern Utah County. |
2021-11-08 |
Admin User |
David Reece |
2 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
135 |
BDK Acid Based UT Congressional |
UT House Map that splits Utah into North, East, South, and West |
2021-11-08 |
Admin User |
Kevin Jones |
1 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
136 |
UT_2022 |
This pivots from the map submitted by the committee. It cleans up some of the conflicts with travel and has no population deviation. |
2021-11-08 |
Admin User |
Luke Tanner |
1 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
137 |
UT_2022B |
Similar to UT_2022 but takes Hill and puts it into CD1. |
2021-11-08 |
Admin User |
Luke Tanner |
1 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
138 |
Green Grass Movement |
This plan aims to divide the prominent parts of Utah into equal portions, attempting to provide fair representation to all. In order to fulfill district requirements, some boundaries are not ideal. |
2021-11-08 |
Admin User |
James Aland |
0 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
139 |
BDK House Districts based on School 2 Electric |
House districts based on BDK School 2 Electric Boogaloo |
2021-11-08 |
Admin User |
Kevin Jones |
0 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
142 |
Took me an hour |
How to not gerrymander: spend like 15 minutes and do it geographically. |
2021-11-08 |
Admin User |
Hanz Franzki |
1 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
143 |
BDK UT Congressional Cities First |
Map that nearly matches this one on DRA https://davesredistricting.org/join/540dd5ae-f0b6-4945-8722-1abaaaceaa2e, That was made by dividing Utah into 4 directions (1 North, 2 East, 3 South, 4 West) and then giving cities to their respective district direction, filling in the surrounding blocks, then finally cracking 4 precincts between the blocks to achieve complete population equality. This splits are FIPS 49011NS0070 (Split between North and East), 49035SLC003 and 49035SLC007 (Splits between East and West), and 49049CH004 (Split between East and South). These also are where cities are split as well. This is My final Map, please let the legislature provide the Great State of Utah a Fair Congressional Map. |
2021-11-08 |
Admin User |
Kevin Jones |
0 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
144 |
BDK UT Congressional Cities First but with 2 southern districts |
BDK UT Congressional Cities First but with 2 southern districts",
"description": "Same as BDK UT Congressional Cities first but western districts reaches southern border, Draper city and parts of Utah and lower counties swapped around. Check it out on DRA as well here https://davesredistricting.org/maps#viewmap::0ff3da00-b772-4d3f-bb30-9d8588d227c8 |
2021-11-08 |
Admin User |
Kevin Jones |
0 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
145 |
BDK House based on school board |
BDK House based on school board |
2021-11-08 |
Admin User |
Kevin Jones |
0 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
147 |
Stoddard Congress 01 |
A plan submitted for consideration by the Legislative Redistricting Committee. |
2021-11-08 |
Admin User |
Rep. Andrew Stoddard |
7 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
150 |
Committee Chairs Proposal - Congress 2 |
A proposal |
2021-11-08 |
Admin User |
Sen. Scott Sandall and Rep. Paul Ray |
38 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
156 |
HB2004 |
Numbered bill for Special Session. |
2021-11-09 |
Admin User |
Rep. Paul Ray |
81 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
160 |
HB2004S01 |
Numbered bill for special session |
2021-11-09 |
Admin User |
Rep. Ray Ward |
1 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
162 |
HB2004S02 |
Numbered bill for special session |
2021-11-09 |
Admin User |
Rep. Andrew Stoddard |
0 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
163 |
HB2004S03 |
Numbered bill for special session |
2021-11-09 |
Admin User |
Rep. Jennifer Dailey-Provost |
1 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
164 |
HB2004S04 |
Numbered bill for special session |
2021-11-09 |
Admin User |
Rep. Clare Collard |
1 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
165 |
HB2004S05 |
Numbered bill for special session |
2021-11-09 |
Admin User |
Rep. Suzanne Harrison |
4 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
168 |
HB2004S06 |
Numbered bill for special session |
2021-11-09 |
Admin User |
Sen. Kathleen A. Riebe |
3 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
169 |
HB2004S07 |
Numbered bill for special session |
2021-11-09 |
Admin User |
Sen. Derek L. Kitchen |
1 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |
184 |
CONGRESS ENROLLED HB2004 |
Plan passed by the Legislature |
2021-11-18 |
Admin User |
Final Plan |
0 |
No Attachment |
Download |
Open |