I like this map, but it looks like it would make more sense to make the split at point of the mountain. It seems to represent populations without dividing slc too much.

This is a reasonable map that attempts to keep geographic areas together.

This map makes a lot of sense for fair representation with less splitting. Thank you for at least trying to make it fair.

I appreciate this attempt to retain integrity for cities and counties. I deliver for Meals on Wheels and have common issues with those I visit in Glendale, Rose Park, and West Valley. It is also inclusive of many of those I work with to include Summit Park. We have similar concerns to include air quality, transportation, homeless people, and affordable housing.

As a West Jordan resident, I appreciate this map and feel like it would allow my community to have representation.

I like this one. It keeps the rural areas together and the urban areas together. Southern Utah is well represented.

This map does a much better job and creating districts that are actually representative of different communities. Splitting SLC into giant districts just allows representatives to avoid their urban constituents. I'd love to see a town hall held within a reasonable distance of the population core.

It's not a perfect map, but of all the maps currently on offer, it is, by far, the most fair. And the most legal, aligns best with the guidelines of Prop 4. Major interest areas are kept together, giving Salt Lake City a fair shot at representatives who actually represent us.

This map is better that the other few I've seen. At least SLCo isn't split 4 different ways and the needs of those in the district will be given a voice.

This map seems to keep the community of Salt Lake City mostly whole and fairly represented, unlike the current districts being replaced. There is a fair shot for the community of Salt Lake City to have representation for our community needs. This seems to meet the goals of prop 4.

This map seems to align the best with prop 4 of the other maps, keeping area of major interest together while avoiding shoestringing, earmuffing, pinwheeling, and isolation of voting district portions by geographic boundaries.

This map is not gerrymandered and groups together existing communities as voting districts. Salt Lake County is a district and rural Utah is a district, as well as North & South of SLCounty. This map is fair and represents ALL of Utah.

It definitely is not perfect, but Salt Lake County has a voice in this map.

While it isn’t perfect, it does give Salt Lake County a voice.

I while I still do not like that Salt Lake County is split up, this seems to be the fairest of all the maps and encompasses the spirit of Prop 4 the best

This is the best map in my opinion. It keeps like communities together and makes a distinction between urban and rural districts.

This seems to be the best option for keeping Salt Lake County and keeping urban and rural areas together. This is what Prop 4 was for.

Best map for prop 4--it does not split very many cities or counties, is compact and contiguous.

This map best aligns with Proposition 4 because it creates compact, contiguous districts while keeping more municipalities and communities of interest together. It minimizes unnecessary splits of Salt Lake County compared to the other proposed maps, which better reflects the requirements voters approved in Prop 4.

I think this map does a good job of trying to keep population centers and similar communities together as much as possible. This map should help more people feel like they have a representative who understands them and knows what their needs are.

This one minimizes city and county splits as much as possible. Yes, District 4 covers a lot of land, but given the population distribution of our state, this is actually compact and contiguous.

This map does a reasonable job of maintaining compact districts and areas of similar concerns together.

Wasatch county is one of the fastest growing areas of Utah. Why not expand mapping to include us with more of the Wasatch front area, we have very little in common with the Uinta basin.

This map does a good job of seperating the urban areas from the rural but I don't think Rich County should be split.

This seems to be the best option for keeping SLC together as much as possible, and dividing urban areas/rural areas up with similar needs. Hopefully this will help with better representation for everyone's individual needs.

This one seems to do a pretty decent job keeping communities in SLC county and Utah county together. However, I do wonder if there are better ways to include portions of District 4 with other districts. For example, Moab has a different voting culture than most of Iron county

This map is one of the better options. I like how a large portion of Salt Lake County stays together. City and rural voters have different needs. This map allows better representation for both.

this looks good. keeping as much of salt lake county together is good because we share general needs splitting salt lake county into the rural areas of Utah doesn't help anyone

I like this map. It puts folks in the Northern area of Utah together, the folks in Southern Utah together, and keeps those of us in the cities mostly together. Bravo whoever put this map together.

I like this map. Seems fair and splits contiguous cities up as much as possible.

Yes! A map that only splits Salt Lake County into two districts. Although, both are still in urban districts and not sent to a far flung rural area. District 4 folks might not like such a large geographical area, but population is the key.

I like this map, but I would rather be with liberal leaning Salt Lake in my area of Sandy than with Utah County.

SLC votes together!!

I think this map is about as good as you can get for Utah. The Urban areas are represented and the Southern and Northern Utah have their representatives/

This map seems to have made a sincere attempt to honor natural communities. I understand that Salt Lake County has to be split. I don't see why most of the other maps want to split it multiple ways within Kearns or West Jordan. These communities have a history and affiliation. Keep them intact. Pay attention to city and municipal affiliations. This one does a reasonable job of doing so.

This one I like. It keeps me, my neighbors, my workplace, and my parents' house (just 15 minutes away) in a single district, which is not the case with the current map. I almost want to say, "duh!"

I like that this map groups more densely populated areas separately from more rural areas. The two have different needs and this map may lead to each having a voice instead of neither having a voice.

I think the map does a good job at giving most of utah equal opportunities for representation.

I like this map. It keeps more communities together with more common interests.

This map has the most logistical break up of the state as far as keeping communities with similar demographics and interests together. By breaking Salt Lake into two districts, this map mitigates the existing (unconstitutional) gerrymandering that intentionally suppresses the urban voters.

This appears to unite common voices, more urban and then more rural. Salt Lake County is more alike than different. This map only splits it into two districts, not four. It's the best of the choices.

This is a better choice in splitting SL County into two instead of four districts, and keeping communities more intact.

This map keeps urban and rural communities separate allowing for proper representation for Rural Utah. I also minimizes splits in Salt Lake county

This map seems to do a good job of keeping communities together which share interests.

Very good map. I would like to be represented along with other suburbanites rather than having so many districts include rural Utah. I am not against rural Utah - so many of us in the urban centers care deeply about the rural parts of the state and public lands. This is about fair representation of residents, not strictly the land on the map. The only issue I see that could arise is Southern Rich and Morgan counties not being in District 1. I've seen comments on a lot of maps about this. I don't have an opinion on this as I do not live there.

This one is nice. Glad to see Provo kept together, and that the line in Springville isn't super jagged.

This map makes more sense to me than some of the other options, more consistent with the goals of the redistricting efforts.

Much better.

I think this map does a pretty good job of matching how various communities identify themselves and others in the state. The only boundary for which that might not be true is the one between Springville and Spanish Fork.

I like how this keeps a significant portion of Salt Lake County together. This is crucial as urban v. rural is a prominent ideological divide in today's politics.

I appreciate how this map splits the rural and urban vote so the future congressperson can focus on the issues that make their districts unique. This will allow for more fair representation.