I like how this map combines Park City with the northern part of Salt Lake County. I've seen other maps that combined Park City with the southern part of Salt Lake County which doesn't make as much sense because the main transportation connection from Park City is to the northern part.

There are a lot of things that make sense about this map. I like how it combines Tooele, Eagle Mountain, and Lehi together in one district. Though, I'm not sure whether it really makes sense for that district to stretch all the way up to Kearns and Murray.

This map purports to divide 0 cities / towns and only 3 counties. In that regard it is superior to any of the legislative maps proposed. If not dividing cities is really the most important criteria, I think this maps should be in the running and seriously considered. Please have the all the "testing" protocol done on it.

OK, finally someone creates a maps that has a blend of urban and rural communities and isn't completely gerrymandered. I know the legislature doesn't want this type of redistricting, but I think it's time to stop playing games with peoples votes. Make it fair for both sides and let the chips fall where they may.

Very impressive way to accomplish all of the criteria while still having reasonable district shapes and communities.

Out of all maps presented so far, this map seems to fit the criteria best. Least number of splits, equal populations, natural and district boundaries kept.

This map does a great job of following all of the rules laid out in Prop 4. No municipalities split, only 3 county splits with minimal disruption to county borders, and equal population throughout all districts. I urge the Committee to seriously consider this map, as it captures the most fair representation of all Utahns.

I think Map C is the worst of those proposed by the committee. It’s incredible to see how with just a few alterations, it better adheres to both the spirit and letter of Prop 4 than what was expertly produced. Much thanks to Stuart for the dedication and work to prove what is possible with this exercise. I wish the legislature would consider these alterations.

I agree this map addresses Prop 4 criteria best compared to others. I agree with the goal to have two federal representatives representing Utah’s water interests. Thank you again Stuart for another credible map and I expect that the committee can consider this map sufficiently, apply the same analysis and even depose Stuart to verify that it wasn’t created using politically biased methods. It’s just one person to depose and the map appears to be as legitimate as the others being considered.