Solid execution of a remarkably simple concept: keeping communities together. I have quibbles with the exact boundary lines, but it's obvious that this map complies with Prop. 4, unlike any of the maps the congressional majority proposed. Maps like this make it obvious how blatantly partisan the other maps are.

This map splits less counties but still keeps SL county interests represented. I like that Southern Utah is kept together to represent the needs of the tourist areas.

I really like this map. This will help my area to have better representation so my representative isn't split so much between urban and rural issues. She would finally be able to focus on what is truly important to her constituents. It doesn't split up many communities, it tries to go with rational boundaries. It does make my district very large, which may be difficult to cover, but we usually communicate electronically now with our representatives, so that will be less of a problem. I'd love it if the northern boundary of district 4 could come down a bit, but I realize that's not really possible and keep similar types of communities together.

This map does an excellent job of keeping communities of interest together in the most populated areas of the state, which have been lacking representation for so long. Very few city and county splits. The more rural areas of the state would continue to have representation proportionate to the their population. The problem is with travel time in district 4, but I don't think that is avoidable when we have such a large state with only four congressional districts, and this map does a good job of minimizing the travel time as much as possible. Other maps proposed have long travel times in every single district and group places like Sandy, where I live, with Mexican Hat. The people in the Salt Lake Valley deserve fair representation, and Utah has a chance to be a leader in the nation when many other states are embracing partisan gerrymandering wholeheartedly. Utah likes to tout itself as a leader, and it is time to put that into practice and be an example of fair districting and equal representation. This map is a good start toward that goal.

This map is most in keeping with the law in keeping cities and counties whole and preserving neighborhoods and communities of interest.

I strongly favor this map over all the other options. It has the best and most logical geographical compactness, population balance, and unlike every other option keeps communities and cities together in easily understandable ways. This is the first one to respect the letter and intent of the voters as enacted in Proposition 4.

This is a really good map. I like how it has Tooele connected with Eagle Mountain rather than Davis or Box Elder counties. That shows good attention to human communities and connections rather than just areas on a map. Also it keeps Orem and Provo together which makes sense.

I like this one, but there are some challenges in Utah with such a low population density in southern and central Utah. It feels strange to have Provo and it's southern suburbs split. I would prefer to have more continuity there but this is so much better than the 5 maps we saw.

it keeps communities of interest whole, preserves density, and empowers Utahns in the federal government. At all levels, from constituent to congressperson communication, to empowering municipal participation in the federal government, this map (or any of its slight variants) is genuinely among the most perfect you can get of any state in the country for the 2020 centus,

follows municipal boundaries

This seems more appropriate. Using I-15 as a dividing line makes sense. Splitting midvale and sandy apart where I live doesn't make sense.

This is a surprisingly good map that keeps Salt Lake intact and follows geo-political contours of the state, putting the south western quadrant of the SL valley into UT County.

This map reflects Utah's diversity and allows for fair and competitive elections, representing constituents better than many of the other options.

This map better represents political and cultural geographical interests than other maps I've seen. Overall a map should be divided to best represent the different lifestyles (both urban and rural) and needs of their constituents. This map does a good job to capture that.

Good map, my only complaint is the putting Morgan with Weber and Davis issue that I've mentioned on numerous plans here.

This is much better than others.

This is a great map, although I am not a huge fan of having to split Rich County due to its low population.

A map that actually has compact districts over urban areas! Much better than the 5 the committee has put forward.

I would be happy with this map. I particularly love that Provo's southern city limit is the boundary--it's a very good place to draw a line.

This is easily one of the best maps, if not the best map altogether. It has the best geographical compactness, population balance, and, most importantly, best groups people according to shared interests and culture. Rural southern Utah voters won't be forced to be represented by someone living along the Wasatch Front while urban voters can't be selectively ignored by their reps. As someone with a degree in anthropology and a certificate in/experience with GIS (geographic information systems), this map best exemplifies what congressional districts should be based on - shared cultural values and political interests, even population spread, and keeping communities together.

This map best keeps population areas together and would represent constituents with shared interests and circumstances (urban, rural, north, and south).