Do not use this map. It splits SLC/SLcty, into 3 sections, and therefore does not follow the standards of Proposition 4. Use the Escamilla-Owens-Map.

Do not use this map. It splits SLC/SLcty, into 3 sections, and therefore does not follow the standards of Proposition 4. Use the Escamilla-Owens-Map.

This map would negatively affect my community. This displaces voters. We want the community to feel empowered to vote, and this map would disempower instead. This is a map with a lot of gerrymandering.

Do not use this map. This map splits SLC/SLcty, a community of interest, and therefore does not follow the standards of Proposition 4. Use the Escamilla-Owens-Map. This E-O map gives a Rep for the South, North and two Reps to cover the population centers.

This is an obviously gerrymandered map, breaking up communities to effectively deny representation.

This map perpetuates gerrymandering, cutting municipalities with common interests up while combining disparate areas of Utah together into a district.

This map doesn't make sense. You're grouping urban, suburban, and rural groups in nonsensical ways, even though we have competing needs. Please listen to what the people have been begging for and stop gerrymandering.

Dislike this map. It violates the principles of Prop 4 that was voted on and approved by the voters of Utah

This map violates the people's intent. The ideal map should keep Salt Lake City whole and should not divide cities, like NSL, where I live. I support using a map created by the independent redistricting committee before the committee was hijacked by Republican appointees (Hi, Rob Bishop!), and then the language was amended. Make this fair. If you have to gerrymander to win, your ideas aren't vetted through the people voting for a representative. And while you're at it, please fix the state house and senate maps.

This map does not follow the principles of Prop 4. It does not keep communities with similar interests together.

This map does not meet Prop 4. It perpetuates gerrymandering.

Does not follow principles of Proposition 4. Continues to divide Salt Lake County into 4 pieces. Communities deliberately divided.

This map perpetuates the gerrymandering of the 2010 and 2020 redistricting maps. It divides up Salt Lake county in 'pie-slice' pieces reducing the responsibilities of representatives to the needs of Salt Lake residents. It is contrary to the goals of Proposition 4 and does not allow fair representation of the residents in the state who live in Salt Lake County, the largest county in the state.

This map fails to keep Salt Lake County, the most populous county in our state with 34% of the entire state population as a single community of interest. This map goes against allowing a single group to choose its own representative. The power of the citizenry is diluted with any division of this county.

This map divides and places voters together with differing needs from their representation. Creating a situation in which the representative is forced to choose which constituents he will represent as their needs will often be at odds. We can look at growth, water use, etc. This will lead to poor representation of large portions of the population. This map also does not preserve communities of interest of like needs. This map is ill-suited to represent Utah and should be rejected.

This map is gerrymandered. This map splits Salt Lake County into 4 different districts. This map is partisan and doesn't represent Utah voters. There are 4 steps to create fair maps, and this map includes 0 of the 4 steps. Step 1: Districts should have a regular shape, avoiding "shoestring" or "earmuff" formations designed to capture or exclude specific voters. Step 2: All parts of a district must be geographically connected. Step 3: Where possible, districts should respect pre-existing municipal, county, or other political boundaries. Step 4: Districts should be drawn to keep communities with shared interests together.

Ridiculous.

This map is inconsistent with the intent of Prop 4. It divides the largest population center and merges it with rural areas, while also fragmenting counties and cities, which undermines fair representation.

A ridiculous attempt to continue gerrymandering our state. Arbitrary boundaries that chop communities in half.

This map once again does not follow Prop 4. It splits Salt Lake County into multiple districts and groups urban and rural communities together. The needs are different for rural communties

This map does not follow the requirements of Proposition 4. It divides Salt Lake County into multiple districts in a way that stretches across very different regions and communities, which weakens compactness and undermines community representation. The map creates unnecessary splits that fail to keep communities of interest intact.

This map does not follow the rules of Proposition 4. This unnecessarily divides communities and combines groups that have vastly different backgrounds and needs. This is a terrible map and should not be considered at all.

As a resident of Provo, I do not like the Utah County split. It is not necessary, as demonstrated by other maps, and does not adhere to Prop 4.

While I like how this distributes population better and follows city boudaries in a more coherent way, we are again running into the problem of grouping in more rural communities with higher density ones. On it's face, I don't think that could be a bad thing (could give better representation to smaller communities but could also keep back areas that are growing), our political reps show that they cannot be trusted to consider all of their constituents when we have a map laid out like this. We would have very little competitiveness in elections and it's would be short-sided to have so many counties spilt up like this.

Yet ANOTHER gerrymandered map that purposefully dilutes the SLC/ SL County voter base into a rural area. The ONLY map that achieves any level of fairness per Prop 4 is the Escamilla - Owens maps. All of the these other maps are complete waste of everyones time.

This map is no good. It breaks up most of the urban areas and combines them with very rural areas.

This neighborhood is a really tight-knit community and should be kept together. Have the boundary along Old Bingham Highway to prevent splitting up this community.

This map separates and cracks Salt Lake County into too many pieces and combines it with communities that have very different needs. This map still looks like gerrymandering.

This is not a good map because it puts urban and suburban folks with rural folks who have different and often competing needs.

This map cuts up communities, including mine, in a non-logical and gerrymandered fashion. It does not give urban areas a united voice and true representation. My representative in district 4 could never represent my interests in Canyon Rim while also trying to represent most of western rural Utah. With this map I have neighbors to the north and south that are within several miles of me and are placed into other districts, for no logical reason. The communities all have the same interests and concerns and should be represented collectively. This map splits up communities in odd ways that should instead be grouped together to ensure proper representation of those areas of Utah. It seems to split up neighborhoods to the point that two neighbors could be in completely different districts. Also, the needs and concerns of the rural corners of Utah are going to be different than the more population dense urban centers and both need to be represented.

Gerrymandered trash!

splitting slc and diluting into rural gives unequal representation and dilutes there voices. this map in yet another textbook gerrymander.

This map clearly repeats the vailure to keep counties and cities whole as it splits Salt Lake County in a political effort to promote a partisian map. Salt Lake County has 1.2 million and the district needs to have 870,000. So some part of the county need to join another district. That can be just one part of teh county and not this. This is clearly exactly what the counrt found wrong with previous maps. I am schocked that the legislature has the audacity to promote this brazen wrong map.

Rural and Urban need to be split. We cannot split Salt lake county that many times

This breaks up Salt Lake too much with rural areas, which have different concerns.

The portion of Salt Lake County that is tacked onto the West desert has little in common with it. This map looks like an attempt to water down the urban heart of Salt Lake County. This map feels like an attempt to tweak the maps that were thrown out by the courts and pretend to truly allow the urban center to have fair representation.

Rural and urban should be split.

This map makes representation difficult be combining urban and rural areas that have different needs- I'm not optimistic about the outcomes from such division.

It feels weird to stretch Salt Lake City, Provo, Ogden and Park City (our largest cities in Northern Utah) all across the state to the Northmost, Eastmost, Southmost, and Westmost corners when we are all 30 min from each other. It just makes very different urban vs. rural areas share a representative, and that cannot be helpful for the people, or the representative to do a good job.

This map seems disingenuous. Urban versus rural is a prominent ideological divide in today's politics. I hesitate to think that a representative could advocate for my needs, someone who needs the great salt lake to stay filled for clean air, while impartially advocating for the needs of rural, farming Utah (who use the water for their livelihood but are also a significant part of water consumption). As someone from SLC, I should trust that I have at least one representative who is working for me on the national level. The same is true of rural utahns--they should be able to trust their representative is advocating for them.

I personally dont think this is fair to our urban and rural communities. A representative should come from the community they are representing. It is a similar issue we run into today where large districts compete for the attention of one person. We need to do better than this map.

The wagon spoke design, that cleverly divides SL County in order to mute it's voice, is exactly why we are going through this process in the first place.

As a sandy resident this map is ridiculous. Urban and rural voters have different needs.

As a resident of Midvale, I don't believe this map would represent my city fairly as the district encompasses large amounts of rural Utah.

I don't understand why they are splitting Salt Lake County. It seems they want to mute the voice of Salt Lake Citizens.

The way District 2 goes over the mountain to grab southern Salt Lake County and northern Utah County is less than ideal. These areas do not share a community of interest or a good means of transportation to the rest of their proposed district.