MyDistricting | Utah Legislative Redistricting Committee
Enterprise Redistricting Software & Services by Citygate GIS
TRBStateHouse1
Provide your comments for consideration in the 2021 Redistricting process
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
District 6
District 7
District 8
District 9
District 10
District 11
District 12
District 13
District 14
District 15
District 16
District 17
District 18
District 19
District 20
District 21
District 22
District 23
District 24
District 25
District 26
District 27
District 28
District 29
District 30
District 31
District 32
District 33
District 34
District 35
District 36
District 37
District 38
District 39
District 40
District 41
District 42
District 43
District 44
District 45
District 46
District 47
District 48
District 49
District 50
District 51
District 52
District 53
District 54
District 55
District 56
District 57
District 58
District 59
District 60
District 61
District 62
District 63
District 64
District 65
District 66
District 67
District 68
District 69
District 70
District 71
District 72
District 73
District 74
District 75
Comment Added
Your comment has been added to the map.
Population and Geography based on 2020 Census
Loading...
Carol Barnett
I strongly support the Escamilla/Owens map because it delivers on the goals of Proposition 4—fairness, competitiveness, and representation. This map is compact, respects population diversity, and creates truly competitive districts that give voters a real chance to be heard. Although it divides some cities and counties more than other maps, these divisions are necessary to ensure a balanced mix of urban and rural interests, and they prevent unfair partisan advantages. Utahns voted for Prop 4 to move beyond gerrymandering, and the Escamilla/Owens map is the best choice to honor that commitment and secure fair, effective congressional representation.
James Otto
Most of the districts on this map appear to be fair, with only minor deviations in population (generally around 0.5% at most, with few exceptions). There are very few splits or "spears" of one district into another and when looking closer they are reasonable to balance population as best as possible.
Craig Donald Case
Gerrymandering protects the party in power, and keeps incumbents in power. It is immoral and wrong, wrong, wrong. The message Robert Azson sent today defending and justifying the changing of the district boundaries, is pathetic. Stop it! Stop it now! Let the voters decide who they want to represent them rather than the politicians. C'mon you guys. You know this is true.
Janeen Bawden
I want map C because it respects the criteria of equal population, it preserves traditional neighborhoods, minimizes municipal and county splits, and just makes sense!
Raeleen A Sanchez
I am opposed to all redistricting maps prepared by Utah State Legislative members. The Public voted for an independent redistricting committee and all proposed maps to be considered should be prepared by that committee!
Nicole Kunz
Utahns demanded fair maps in 2018. Instead, we got politicians dragging their feet, telling us they’re redrawing ‘under protest’ only because the Supreme Court made them. We deserve independent maps that reflect our communities which is what we voted for.
Julianne Peck Dabling
Go back to the Independent redistricting proposal. It is the best, moral, ethical version which provides representation for the people of salt lake county.
Katy Owens Hubler
This map unnecessarily divides the community of Greater Park City, which includes Kimball Junction, Summit Park and Silver Summit.
Madeline
do not split Park City