MyDistricting | Utah Legislative Redistricting Committee
Enterprise Redistricting Software & Services by Citygate GIS
UT House Proposal Redone
Provide your comments for consideration in the 2021 Redistricting process
Loading geometries...
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
District 6
District 7
District 8
District 9
District 10
District 11
District 12
District 13
District 14
District 15
District 16
District 17
District 18
District 19
District 20
District 21
District 22
District 23
District 24
District 25
District 26
District 27
District 28
District 29
District 30
District 31
District 32
District 33
District 34
District 35
District 36
District 37
District 38
District 39
District 40
District 41
District 42
District 43
District 44
District 45
District 46
District 47
District 48
District 49
District 50
District 51
District 52
District 53
District 54
District 55
District 56
District 57
District 58
District 59
District 60
District 61
District 62
District 63
District 64
District 65
District 66
District 67
District 68
District 69
District 70
District 71
District 72
District 73
District 74
District 75
Population and Geography based on 2020 Census
Loading...
Jake Hendriksen
The people of Utah have already spoken on this matter, when we voted for and passed Proposition 4. Any changes to the maps proposed by the Independent Redistricting Commission are simply unacceptable. With good reason, based upon sad history, we do not trust the Legislature to put the desires of the people over their own. The reason for that distrust is demonstrated yet again in these gerrymandered districts presented here.
Raelene Blocker
This District is geographically too large.
Clay P
Maps that were not developed and designed by the Independent redistricting commission are a direct violation of the peoples will. The State is violating the will of the voters by stripping Prop 4 of its power, so they can attempt to consolidate power further, the house proposed boundaries do not represent the people, and fail to uphold the will of the people when Prop 4 passed by more votes than any single politician in the state house represents, yet these people who have received less than 20 thousand votes in their wins, believe they know what is best for the 600k+ who voted for an Independent commission.
Clay P
Maps that were not developed and designed by the Independent redistricting commission are a direct violation of the peoples will. The State is violating the will of the voters by stripping Prop 4 of its power, so they can attempt to consolidate power further, the house proposed boundaries do not represent the people, and fail to uphold the will of the people when Prop 4 passed by more votes than any single politician in the state house represents, yet these people who have received less than 20 thousand votes in their wins, believe they know what is best for the 600k+ who voted for an Independent commission.
Linda J Eddington
Blatant attempt to dilute SLC area voters interests. Rural voters also deserve to have a clear voice. This serves no one but the Republican party.
Penny Jameson
This is an embarrassing arrogant disregard for the opinion of voters expressed in Prop 4, and of the transparent and inclusive work of the Independent Redistricting Committee which produced 5 legitimate options for consideration. How can you justify that? How can you claim this map to be the result of a democratic process?
Patricia becnel
The redistricting plan created by the independent council is much fairer, less gerrymandered and expresses the will of the people. It should be used. I DO NOT support the plan made by legislators.
Sarah Duensing
If it wasn't drawn by the IRDC we don't want it! The voters spoke when we passed Prop 4 in 2018.